<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://192.168.1.50:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/139">
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>http://192.168.1.50:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/139</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://192.168.1.50:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/144" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://192.168.1.50:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/143" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://192.168.1.50:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/142" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://192.168.1.50:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/141" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-05-26T10:44:28Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://192.168.1.50:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/144">
    <title>Bloom’s Modern Critical Interpretations William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet</title>
    <link>http://192.168.1.50:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/144</link>
    <description>Title: Bloom’s Modern Critical Interpretations William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet
Authors: Harold Bloom
Abstract: Harold C. Goddard, in his The Meaning of Shakespeare (1951), remarked&#xD;
upon how much of Shakespeare turns upon the vexed relationships between&#xD;
generations of the same family, which was also one of the burdens of&#xD;
Athenian tragedy. Except for the early Titus Andronicus, which I judge to&#xD;
have been a charnel-house parody of Christopher Marlowe, Romeo and&#xD;
Juliet was Shakespeare’s first venture at composing a tragedy, and also his&#xD;
first deep investigation of generational perplexities. The Montague-Capulet&#xD;
hatred might seem overwrought enough to have its parodistic aspects, but it&#xD;
destroys two immensely valuable, very young lovers, Juliet of the Capulets&#xD;
and Romeo of the Montagues, and Mercutio as well, a far more interesting&#xD;
character than Romeo. Yet Romeo, exalted by the authentic love between&#xD;
the even more vital Juliet and himself, is one of the first instances of the&#xD;
Shakespearean representation of crucial change in a character through&#xD;
self-overhearing and self-reflection. Juliet, an even larger instance, is the&#xD;
play’s triumph, since she inaugurates Shakespeare’s extraordinary procession&#xD;
of vibrant, life-enhancing women, never matched before or since in all of&#xD;
Western literature, including in Chaucer, who was Shakespeare’s truest&#xD;
precursor as the creator of personalitie</description>
    <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://192.168.1.50:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/143">
    <title>Bloom’s Modern Critical Interpretations William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar</title>
    <link>http://192.168.1.50:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/143</link>
    <description>Title: Bloom’s Modern Critical Interpretations William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar
Authors: Harold Bloom</description>
    <dc:date>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://192.168.1.50:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/142">
    <title>A Critical History of English Literature</title>
    <link>http://192.168.1.50:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/142</link>
    <description>Title: A Critical History of English Literature
Authors: DAVID DAICHES
Abstract: TillS IS AN AGE of specialist .schoiars, and for one man to attempt a&#xD;
complete history of English literature is now both rash and unusual.&#xD;
I cannot claim to be a specialist in all the periods on which I have&#xD;
written, nor, in spite of my best attempts, have I been able to keep&#xD;
abreast of all new developments in English studies. But I have been&#xD;
reading English literature continuously and closely ever since I be-&#xD;
gan my studies at Edinburgh University in 1930, and I have long felt&#xD;
the urge to describe the whole scene as I see it. This, therefore, is&#xD;
one man's history of English literature; it is intended less as a work&#xD;
of reference than as a. work of description, explanation, and critical&#xD;
interpretation. It is not meant to be looked up, but to be read. I have&#xD;
given myself generous space in dealing with major figures such as&#xD;
Shakespeare and Milton, without bothering whether, in strict terms&#xD;
of relative greatness, they deserve so much more than I have given&#xD;
to some other writers. Indeed, ,the chapters on Shakespeare and&#xD;
Milton can perhaps stand as ind~pendent critical studies, capable of&#xD;
being extracted from the rest of the History and read as short books&#xD;
on their Own. Nevertheless, thougb the word "critical" in my title is&#xD;
important, I have tried never to lose sight of the fact that this is a&#xD;
history, not a series of separate critical studies, and the appropriate&#xD;
kinds of historical generalizations and the proper continuity of nar-&#xD;
rative have, I hope, been maintained throughout. I may sometimes&#xD;
have treated a minor writer who interests me particularly at greater&#xD;
length than he deserves, or rather briefly summarized something im-&#xD;
portant and well known. But I have tried to see my subject steadily&#xD;
and see it whole; and I have tried to write interestingly, less as the&#xD;
impersonal scholar recording facts than as the interested reader shar-&#xD;
ing his knowledge and opinions.</description>
    <dc:date>1961-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://192.168.1.50:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/141">
    <title>English Literature Its History and Its Significance for the Life of the English Speaking World</title>
    <link>http://192.168.1.50:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/141</link>
    <description>Title: English Literature Its History and Its Significance for the Life of the English Speaking World
Authors: William J. Long</description>
    <dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

